Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Orv Hetil ; 163(33): 1295-1302, 2022 Aug 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2265633

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia plus Panel (bioMérieux) is a PCR method for microbiological diagnostics of lower respiratory infections. It can detect 18 bacteria, 9 viruses and 7 antibiotic resistance genes in real time. It can help the differential diagnosis and the choice of therapy of pneumonia, by giving results in two hours. OBJECTIVE: Reviewing the results of pneumonia PCR tests performed in our laboratory, and comparing them with the results of conventional culturing. METHOD: From October 2020 to September 2021, 820 lower respiratory tract samples were analyzed from inpatients with suspected pneumonia. Beside the PCR test, culturing was also performed. Oropharyngeal swabs were used for supplementary SARS-CoV-2 PCR. RESULTS: 40% of samples were collected from SARS-CoV-2-positive patients. In 60% of the samples, the PCR test detected pathogens or resistance genes. The most commonly detected pathogens were Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus and Acinetobacter baumannii. 44% of the bacteria detected by PCR were not verified by culturing, whereas by culturing, several other bacteria, fungi and antibiotic resistance mechanisms were detected, which were not shown in the results of the multiplex PCR tests. In SARS-CoV-2-positive inpatients, 25.8% of the detected bacteria was S. aureus. The most common resistance gene was mecA/C (MRSA). In this group, other respiratory virus genes were detected in 2% of SARS-CoV-2-positive patients, whereas in 13% in samples of SARS-CoV-2-negative patients. CONCLUSIONS: Because of the importance of pathogens excluded from the PCR targets and multifactorial mechanisms of antibiotic resistance, culturing is recommended to perform beside pneumonia-specific multiplex PCR tests. Orv Hetil. 2022; 163(33): 1295-1302.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pneumonia , Bacteria , COVID-19/diagnosis , Humans , Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Staphylococcus aureus
2.
J Mycol Med ; 31(4): 101198, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1356371

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Data suggests that invasive fungal infections (IFI) might complicate COVID-19. Our goal was to describe characteristics of IFI among critically ill COVID-19 adults. METHODS: A retrospective observational case-series analysis was done between March-July 2020. Consecutive patients with critical COVID-19 were eligible, and have been included when proven or putative/probable IFI could be confirmed during their course. For COVID-19 diagnosis, ECDC definitions and WHO severity criteria were followed. Candidaemia was diagnosed according to the ESCMID 2012 guideline. Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) was defined following EORTC/MSG, ECMM/ISHAM and modified AspICU criteria. Outcome variables were rates of IFIs, in-hospital all-cause mortality, rate and time to negative respiratory SARS-CoV-2 PCR. RESULTS: From 90 eligible patients, 20 (22.2%) fulfilled criteria for IFI. Incidence rate for IFI was 2.02 per 100 patient-days at ICU. Patients were mostly elderly males with significant comorbidities, requiring mechanical ventilation because of ARDS. IFI could be classified as candidaemia in 7/20 (40%), putative/probable IPA in 16/20 (80.0%). Isolated species of candidaemia episodes were Candida albicans (4/9, 44.4%), Candida glabrata (3/9, 33.3%), Candida parapsilosis (1/9, 11.1%), Candida metapsilosis (1/9, 11.1%). Mold isolates from lower respiratory tract were Aspergillus fumigatus, BAL galactomannan positivity was prevalent (16/20, 80.0%). Mortality was 12/20 (60.0%) with a median time to death of 31.0±37.0 (5-89) days. Only 9/20 (45.0%) patients reached SARS-CoV-2 PCR negativity after a median time of 20.0±12.0 (3-38) days. CONCLUSION: In this small cohort of critically ill COVID-19 adults, morbidity and mortality related to invasive fungal infections proved to be significant.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Invasive Fungal Infections , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19 Testing , Candidemia , Critical Illness , Female , Humans , Hungary/epidemiology , Invasive Fungal Infections/diagnosis , Invasive Fungal Infections/epidemiology , Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL